---start---- neuro 11/21 hand neuroplasticity plasticity: the ability of the nervous system to adapt or adjust functionally/physiologically (that you can't see) and/or anatomically (you can see the change) to changes in the external or internal environment, or to PNS/CNS damage, or changes in its activation. much of our remaining study in neuro will involve how nuclei interact with eachother in pathways, and how these connections permit the organism to exist in the environment, to record sounds and visual input, to navigate the environemnt, pathways dealing with touch, chemosensory (taste and smell) and how organism uses info to locomote in environment and regulate behavior. so we're studying hard wiring, static properties of CNS. this hard wiring is specified by genetic and normal developmental processes, but nerve cells aren't just static, they have dynamic properties that can change - structure and function - based on amount and type of info being recieved. the ability of the NS to change like this, functionally and anatomically, is called neuroplasticity. some of the conditions which produce the change are damages to PNS, trauma to CNS, neoplasms that are growing in CNS that interrupt or change input, strokes, which produce alterations of remaining fiber systems, hopefully allowing for some recovery of function. however, those are rather severe changes going on in the NS following trauma and neoplasia, but the NS can also change by more subtle things, in a day to day way, with learning, memory, etc. these are more physiological. this is important b/c it allows organism to change behavior, giving characteristics of individuals. this latter type of neuronal change is more physiological, and is called activity dependent plasticity. it's one of those types that results from "use it or lose it" situation. if you use a certain feature - if you type every day the typing center will be well represented. if you stop doing it, that area of the brain will be reduced. there is a competition in your NS for territory and function - a waxing and waning of various types of sensory sytems and motor systems. it involves our daily experiences. again, those changes are more subtle than those following trauma or neoplasia. they are occuring at a molecular level and you can't detect them visually. this plasticity allows NS to adjust to changes in the world, allows animal to adapt, change behavior, etc. not all these adjustments are positive. there are maladaptive types of plasticity eg wrt chronic pain, a CNS plasticity that is maladaptive or destructive - can be devastating - eg, a leg is removed and someone can have phantom pain, due to a CNS plasticity phenomenon. it's not useful and it is a big problem. so not all plasticity is positve. plasticity as you might think is most robust in the young animal, where the hard wiring isn't fully developed yet. then, changes that occur in certain critical developmental periods are very important. so animals deprived of sensory input at an early age don't develop robust connections. there is hope for some of us as adults, plasticity also occurs in the adult NS that is hard wired, based on activity dependent changes - but this is less robust than in young animal. continuing with intro - there seem to be three changes of synaptic modification or plasticity in CNS first stage: synapse formation stage. occurs mainly in developing animal. this is under direct genetic and developmental control. GCN with VPL to somatosensory area I - this happens regardless of animal getting sensory input. it's genetic. second stage: fine tuning - validation stage. this occurs at certain "sensitive or critical period" when synaptic connections are established but immature and sensitive. here, the amount of sensory activity has an important influence on the connections. here it is important to have normal input - if young animal is deprived of normal input it will not develop robustly in this stage. this may be irreversible. this is activity dependent third or final stage: adult. this is the stage that regulates in a transient and long term way the synaptic connectivity in the NS. based on day to day experiences. while we exist in environment, you might start to play the guitar - won't be as easy as if you started in childhood, but the areas involved can become fine tuned and enriched in the brain, you can increase synaptic contacts and give those areas greater representation - but these changes aren't as robust as they would have been in second stage. all this is adding up to the implication that behavioral potentials are laid down genetically but must be developed through environmental and behavioral factors, and use. they are activity dependent. in the lecture we will get results of a few seminal studies on some mechanisms of neuroplasticity based on snails, and some studies that illustrate mammalian NS plasticity - based on the rat and the whisker system, which is elegantly organized. also some monkey studies. again, b/c mammalian NS is so complex, PIs often try to use simply organized animals - the snail which has 20,000 neurons is a lot easier than a mammal. there are also very simple defensive reflexes in the snail. we're looking at reflexive learning in the snail. (Aplysia is the type of snail). another type of learning is sensitisation, which sensitizes your NS so a light stimulus seems stronger, or conditioning, is another type of learning. learning: the neural events underlying acquisition and storage of information obtained from experience which can then result in short or long term memory recovery: events underlying restoration of function after specific PNS or CNS damage. in learning there are several major theories, most of which can be shot down. one is that there are learning or memory centers in the brain - that's pretty bogus. it has been shown that it's not true. hippocampus has a role in short term memory and temporal lobe has a role in long term memory, but they have other functions and are parts of longer pathways anyway. there is no such thing as learning center - learning and memory involve circuits that are already there and may be doing other things. short term memory used to be thought of as a system of reverberating neural circuits - little loops that self perpetuated - but this isn't true either based on Aplysia study which shows that memory and learning use existing nonreverberating circuits. long term memory - weeks and longer - this isn't clear - there is some thinking that it isan extension of short term memory (true) but also involves synthesis of new proteins and growth of not new synaptic connections (well, sometimes it does that) but enhancement of the existing synaptic connections occurs. probably there is some truth in the synthesis of new proteins part. moving on to actual mechanisms of learning based on Aplysia study: basically you have a tail, a siphon, a respiratory gill, and some other parts of the animal (mantle). some of these parts of the marine snail when activated by touch, shock, nociceptive stimulus - will produce withdrawal of siphon and gill as part of a reflex arc involving sensory neurons. there are 24 sensory neurons connecting through interneurons or directly to the six motor neurons which produce the gill withdrawal. if an animal is stimulated by touch on the siphon, it will cause through these connections a withdrawal of th egill. with repeated stimulation (light tactile stimulation) snail will get habituated to ignore the stimulus and no longer produce the withdrawal, b/c it learns it isn't a danger. what seems to be happening is that with repeated stimulus coming to presynaptic terminal, the Ca++ channels become fatigued. they release all this Ca++ to allow NT release, but eventually they become exhausted, and the following impulses do not produce as much NT and finally the gill won't retract anymore. so habituation is a decrease in response strength when a stimulus is repeatedly applied, based on calcium channel fatigue sensitization: this is where the marine snail gets a nociceptive shock on the tail, which causes a brisk gill withdrawal. it is through a facilitating interneuron which releases serotonin onto the presynaptic area of the neurons on the siphon skin - so serotonin causes presynaptic facilitation of input from the siphon skin. then, if you lightly touch the siphon skin, the animal will withdraw the gill defensively. even if you do it enough so that you should produce habituation, snail doesn't get habituated. so serotonin binds to serotonin receptor and via G protein produces cAMP which then links up with kinases which then go in and do several things - it will shut down K+ channel which tends to repolarize the ending which would make nerve ending not fire- so membrane stays depolarized longer- membrane has lower threshold - so now the Ca++ channel remains open to release more Ca++ which produces more NT release. the cAMP kinase really also through noncalcium mechanism will also encourage vesicles through an unknown mechanism to go to the active sites on presynaptic membranes and make themselves more available to release NT which they will. so this is sensitizing the presynaptic terminal, getting it totally ready to release NT - so now you need less of a stimulus to make it release NT. now, if these changes go on long enough, b/c this is kind of a short term memory thing, if it goes on longer, the longer you keep the shock to the tail going, the longer the sensitization - instead of minutes it may last days to weeks. say instead of one time you stimulate with noxious stimuli four times. then the sensitization may last not just hours but perhaps weeks. so in the short term, there is some longer lasting effect by increasing the sensitization stimulus with habituation if you use the benign stimulus repeatedly and repeat over several sessions, this is also going to last for several weeks. if you only do it over one session, it doesn't last as long. if this goes on long enough you get into a situation of chronic changes that may occur. so with a sensory neuron ending on the dendrite of a motor neuron - with long term habituation you may have a shrinkage of synaptic endings - fewer axonal connectinos to the dendrite. with sensitization long term you may get increased synaptic endings of the axon on the dendrite. also with habituation will have fewer vesicles/NT, and with sensitization more vesicles/NT. eventually these changes will impact the morphology, in other words. another type of learning , more complex, kinda like sensitization but it's important that there is an association b/w the benign stimulus and other stimulus - so if you were shocking the tail of the snail you'd have to pair that with a benign stimulus in a certain narrow range to get conditioning - which is more robust in sensitizing interneurons and motor neurons of gill reflex than is sensitization. what occurs is you must pair the light tactile stimulus with the nociceptive stimulus. the light tactile stimulus of the mantle is applied about 1/2 second before applying nociceptive stimulus to the tail. the light stimulus is the conditioned stimulus and it doesn't cause reflex activity on its own. nociceptive stimulus is the unconditioned stimulus, is very strong, works through facilitating interneurons/serotonin to produce sensitization of conditioned stimulus. the mechanism for this is important for learning, training, etc. first, the conditioned stimulus permits an influx of calcium. Ca++ channels are open and Ca++ enhances calcium dependent adenyl cyclase, which binds to calmodulin, prior to unconditioned nociceptive stimulation. then unconditioned stimulus comes along, serotonin release, binds receptor, binds adenyl cyclase which is bound with calmodulin, and you change the conformation of adenyl cyclase so you increase conversion of AMP to cAMP. with that extra cAMP you activate the protein kinases that are cAMP dependent, you increase NT release, you mobilize NT vesicles, etc. this is a more complex form of sensitization b/c it requires a weak conditioning stimulus which is weak and normally doesn't do much AND a more robust, closely associated stimulus applied shortly after conditioning stimulus. eventually the conditioning stimulus itself will produce the reflex. this drives home the important role of transduction mechanisms in phenomena of learning, which exists in pathways, not in circuits or particular areas, and which uses the same pathways that exist for other purposes. again, it dosen't involve independent processes - changes existing connectivity. keep that stuff in mind. now, other stuff. we're shifting away from the anatomical changes here b/c of time constraints. under mammalian plasticity - we're not talking about sprouting - we'll talk about functional changes b/c this is what translates into behavioral changes. the rat has these 35 long whiskers or vibrissae. these vibrissae on the face are in 5 rows of 7 and eventually they connect with some neurons in layer 4 of somatosensory cortex. not only that, the pattern of the whiskers is mirrored in the pattern of the neurons in the CNS. so by changing activity of whiskers you can look at plasticity in NS> since there is such discrete connectivity in cortex, you know the relationships are maintained on the way up. central process comes with trigeminal nerve to brainstem trigeminal complex and each whisker goes into its own area, and then the trigeminal complex through thalamic tract goes to VPM, and there are cell aggregates there in the same pattern, and then from here it goes to somatosensory cortex. if you activate one whisker for 45 min following injection of radioactive metabolism marker (like glucose), you follow into the brain, which uses glucose for metabolism, the stuff accumulates in areas of activity - so you can trace it through pathways and infer function through this since amount of tracer will correlate to amount of activity. you will see a single column through the cortex - one spot will light up for a single whisker. there is functional and anatomical localization. if you denervate the whiskers all except one on one side, and then leave the other side ok, and allow animal to exist for 45 or so days, and then clip the good whisker, and see what happens in the brain - the whisker which had working whiskers around it has smaller representation than the whisker which was alone on the side of the face which takes up more of the cortex. in an older animal, if you do this, there is still some effect, but less so. more remarkably - if all follicles were removed from one side of a young animal, and the forepaw is activated, you don't see any activity in the face area on the normal side. but on the side where follicles were removed, forepaw activity will show up in the face area as well as in the forepaw area - the forepaw took over that area which was deprived of input. what we did in another animal is that they clipped the whiskers but didn't really do deafferentation - not making any true injury. just clipped whiskers so they don't get bumped. still - the whisker which had normal length neighbors has normal cortical representation. the whisker which has shortened neighbors has increased cortical representation. same thing in adult, but less so. if you stimulate one whisker for 5 minutes a day, representation of that whisker shrinks. this is habituation. but if you feed the animal glucose water (unconditioned) and stimulate whisker simultaneously (conditioned stimulus) there is an increase in representation of the whisker - so size is affected by context of stimulus. this is important - if patients in rehab are exercising out of context, they get habituated, but if you use conditioning stimulus they may do better. also - if median nerve is damaged, ulnar nerve can occupy some of that area in the cortex of the monkey. so if one peripheral nerve is damaged, another one may capture that cortical territory. also if a monkey is asked to put a finger onto a rotating wheel in response for a food reward, the areas of the representation of the fingertip got increases in cortical representation. ---end----