---start--- parasit lok note: friday we didn't have enough time, so we're going to review some of the info about chemical control of HW in dogs. wrt diagnosis of canine HW infections: we discussed the microfilarial exam as the traditional front line of diagnosis. check blood via filtration or knott concentration method, look for circulating microfilariae. we're not looking for an indication of dz severity this way. number of mmf does not correlate with number of adult HW. we also said that a significant proportion of dogs which have hw in vasculature will not have mmf - "occult" HW infxns, most often due to host mounting an Ab response which clears mmf from circulation. this can in itself lead to interstitial lung dz, as mmf are trapped in lung tissue. the approach to this from early on has been to develop a number of serology techniques, measuring host Ab response (early method, preferred method in cats), and measuring presence of dirofilaria Ag in the serum. Soluble Ag can be detected in host serum using ELISA method. most tests measure Ag elaborated by mature female worms. so it is *possible* albeit improbable for a dog with a male only infection to test negative on this test. this method isn't used in cats, which often have single sex male infections, or have very low numbers of worms present, which may give false negative. these tests use immobilized monoclonal antibody, host serum, and a monoclonal Ab conjugate. The second monoclonal Ab is against a different epitope on the Ag, and it is tagged so that it will produce a color change. the nice thing about Ag test kits is that since they measure a product of the worm, the intensity of rxn does correlate with the # of adult worms. so you can quantitate your results to some extent. this helps you to plan treatment. note that to make a good guess, you do assume a 50-50 sex ratio of worms. some of these kits, eg snap test from idex, has a "high antigen" spot, which only shows up if you have say over 20 adult females. so they call that a "semi quantitative" test. the other nice thing about these tests is that they are very specific, do not cross react with dipatalonema reconditum Ag. if you run this test routinely, you don't have to worry about morphological differences b/w dirofilaria and dipetalonema. so if the dog is Ag positive...what then? look at disease severity. class I (asymptomatic) vs class II (moderate) I: clinical signs absent or infrequent, mild. antigen positive. mmf may be positive. rads, HCT, other tests all normal. majority of K9 HW infections are class I. II: (moderate) signs absent or infrequent, mild. Ag positive (if high, class III). mmf may be present. rads show disease- large R heart, some pneumonitis, enlarged PA. HCT about 20-30%. other tests may show moderate changes. III: (severe) signs usually present and maybe severe or persistent. antigen positive - may be high. mmf frequently absent. rads show severe disease. HCT often below 20%. other tests frequently show abnormalities IV: (caval syndrome) signs are present. cardiac failure occuring. Ag positive. mmf frequently absent. rads indicate severedz, hct frequently below 20%, and other tests frequently show abnormalities. these are the cases where worms have moved back into RH and sometimes vena cava, causing heart +/- liver failure, hemoglobinuria, etc. need to react within hours to save dog's life. surgical emergency. classes I-III are treated medically. in the handout is information about the medications. medical management of K9 HW dz requires 3 pronged approach. none of the larval/adult stages respond to the same one drug. eg, no one drug kills mmf and adults. drugs that treat adults will not kill mmf. prong I: get rid of the immediate problem - adult worms. all the drugs used for this purpose are organic arsenicals. old drug of choice was caparsolate. current drug of choice is immiticide (melarsamine dihydrochloride). these drugs are potentially quite toxic. there is a lower margin of safety with these drugs than we'd prefer to have. Immiticide is given IM into deep epaxial muscles of lumbar region. this is an improvement over caparsolate, which needed to be given IV and which provoked a lot of tissue site necrosis if given extravascularly. it's given in two doses 24 hr apart. the reason for that is so that you don't kill all the adults at one time, and because the drug is acutely hepatotoxic. this is the "standard" regime. it minimizes parasite related thromboembolic complications and drug related hepatotoxicity. alternate regime: give dose I, wait 30 days, then give standard regime. this is preferred method for class III dogs with severe disease or high antigen levels. these dogs are at highest risk for acute thromboembolic complications. the split dose alternative regime will kill some worms with the first dose, then allow some recovery time. all adulticide tx is given on an inpatient basis with enforced cage rest. embolic complications are related to excersise level. class IV dogs are treated with surgical removal of worms. caparsalate (thiacetarsamide) was used to tx hw before, and is still out there although no longer being manufactured. this drug is given IV, is more toxic, causes necrosis and sloughing if it gets outside the blood vessel. it is given in 4 doses, twice daily for two days, to minimize potential thromboembolic complications and drug toxicity. there is no alternate dosing regime. you don't get much effect from first day's dosing. you have to give whole course to kill any significant numbers of adult worms. you need a threshold of the drug in circulation to produce killing effect. also, young female worms are pretty resistant to treatment with caparsolate. good news about adulticidal tx is that the primary lesion - villous endothelial plaques - will resolve 1-3 mos post tx. prong II: if the dog is mmf positive at presentation, it's still mmf positive post adulticide tx. you have to get rid of the mmf or they will a) cause diagnostic confusion, b) be reservoir for other dogs, or c) cause problems when other drugs given in future. best way to get rid of mmf is via milbemycin, the active ingredient of interceptor. mmf susceptible at FDA approved dose of .5 mg or 500 mcg/kg. rapid clearance - 24-48 hrs. problem, though - where do the mmf go when you kill them? mainly they get trapped in lungs. as they decompose/autolyse, they may cause acute respiratory signs in these dogs. dogs may become febrile, lethargic, may vomit - usually w/in 8 hrs of tx. probably you should observe dog for 8 hrs post tx. this isn't life threatening rxn, but shouldn't be happening at home - may be alarming to owner, may ruin furniture or carpets, etc. also ivermectin has been used for mmf tx, the approved dose is 6-12 mcg/kg, and that's the dose in heartgard, and that's a preventative dose, but it causes a slow, gradual clearance of mmf - generally too slow. up to 2 yrs ago, ivermectin at 50 mcg/kg was recommended tx for mmf - and has been proven safe - but isn't FDA approved. american HW society has now backed off this recommendation due to milbemycin now being available and working at an approved dosage. dithiazenine (sp) is the only FDA approved mmficide, but it's no longer commercially available. chemoprophylaxis - prong III. a year's supply of preventative will cost $35-40. a course of adulticide therapy at VHUP including labwork, drug, hospitalization is going to be about $500-600 depending on size, length of stay, what tests are needed, etc. prevention is definitely cheaper and less traumatic than treatment. there is no good reason for any dog to get infected with dirofilaria immitis if it is under veterinary care. drugs used are milbemycin (interceptor), at 500 mcg/kg (given monthly); heartgard (ivermectin, 6-12 mcg/kg, monthly); and filaribits (diethylcarbamazine, 2.5-3 mg/lb daily) both milbemycin and ivermectin (the macrolides, he calls them) can cause a mild reaction in mmf positive dogs. you don't want to send clients home with supply of heartgard or interceptor not knowing if they are mmf positive or not. there can be a mild but unpleasant adverse reaction. these drugs work not by maintaining tissue levels over a month, but by killing off a month's worth of accumulated larvae every month. it gets them while they are still in the tissues, so you don't get them in the vasculature at all. it's like a monthly housecleaning, sweeping out L4s. also, if a client skips a month, it's ok. just give it the next month. so 60 day old L4s are still susceptible. actually, it's at least two mos, the grace period - so you could skip two doses. but don't tell clients that, he says... with the diethylcarbamazine, if you give it to an mmf positive dog, it causes a much more severe and potentially fatal anaphylactic like shock reaction. this drug maintains residual levels, killing off L3 as they undergo first phase of development. it works more the way you would consider classic chemoprophylaxis to work - really more preventive. but you must verify mmf negative status before starting tx! if you don't test dogs first, but just put them on milbemycin oxime w/o any testing, and dog is positive, that first dose will clear circulating mmf a lot, then they'll rebound a bit, up to about half the starting level...but by the time you finish the 5th month, you'll be down to zero mmf, and they will never recur. this happens in dogs with significant numbers of adult worms in their hearts. this is one way of creating an occult infection. so here is an argument for working it up before starting mmf tx, and also this is why dogs on these drugs for a year or thereafter don't need knott's testing. the worms are chemosterilized. you would have to do antigen testing. note re: collies: the ivermectin related CNS signs occurred at 10-20 times the approved dosage of ivermectin in dogs, and never at all with milbemycin. this is why Merck adopted a collie as the mascot for Heartgard :) no one has ever seen these signs even in rough coated collies at the approved dosage. ---end---