---start anesth.lec.03.19.98----- anesth 3/19/98 Klide anesthesia equipment Good morning. There are some handouts for the later lecture in the back of the room (EKG handout) we talked before about VIC and VOC and what happens when you change O2 flows. see p 27 of handout. + means increase, - means decrease. with VOC, there is no change in vaporizer output with changes in ventilation. with VIC, there are marked changes in vaporizer output with changes in ventilation. with VOC when minute volume is increased, inspired concentration may go down a little bit. with VIC, when minute volume is changed, inspired concentration goes up a lot. with VOC,when fresh gas flow eg O2 flow is decreased, inspired concentration is decreased. with VIC, oppsite. fresh gas decreased, inspired concentration increases. in both cases you save money VOC have to be highly efficient - have to acheive saturation concentration to work properly. you do know vaporizer output VIC should NOT be efficient=- if too efficient will deliver dangerous concentration. output of vaporizer isn't known. you can increase or decrease it but you don't know what it is. disadvantages of VIC: output varies with ventilation. also, can be accumulation of water in the vaporizer (exhaled gas from patient has water vapor in it at a warm temperature, and as gas goes through the circuit it cools, and vapor condenses. this can happen in the vaporizer. then water mixes with volatile anesthetic, and if you're using it with a wick, wick can get wet with water and get less efficient. also you have to actually think about what you are doing with the VIC advantages of VIC: used to be cheap, but that's not true anymore really so forget it. also, can use with different agents unlike VOC which are agent specific. disadvantage of VOC: initial cost (high), may be difficult to produce adequate inspired concentration with low flow. advantages of VIC: you know delivered concentration (but do you care??), output doesn't vary with ventilation. SAFETY most of the safety systems built in are related to oxygen and nitrous oxide. if a nitrous oxide source was accidentally connected to the O2 side of the anesthesia machine, what would happen? when you turned on the oxygen flow meter and thought you were giving oxygen, you'd give 100% nitrous and the patient would turn blue and die. so there are efforts to prevent this. different parts are color coded - here, O2 is green, and nitrous is blue. in most of the world, O2 is white. CGA standard - compressed gas association standard - large cylinders are connected through the pressure reduction valve. the fittings are threaded. the threads are varied by threads per inch, pitch of threads,and direction of threads. for each gas, threading system is diffferent to prevent you from putting the wrong gas on. pin index safety system: on the cylinder there are holes at different distances and pins are on the machine and this is specific for each gas. diameter index safety system - male and female screw type fittings on the hoses, threaded differently for different gases O2 fail safe system: if you have O2 and nitrous connected and you are using both gases, what happens of O2 tank empties and you don't know about it? you deliver 100% nitrous and kill the patient. to prevent this, modern machines have a fail safe system that is of one or two types. it senses the pressure on the O2 side,and if it falls to a minimum amount, machine will turn off the nitrous. so you give no gas to the patient, which is generally better than 100% nitrous. you would notice this b/c the breathing bag would collapse, patient couldn't inhale, you could rapidly fix it. that's a complete failsafe system. the proportional failsafe - machine knows what flow of nitrous you've chosen, and doesn't let you choose an O2 flow less than 30%, so you can't deliver a hypoxic mixture to the animal. vaporizer filling: you have to pay attention and put the right stuff in, or you can use one of the special fittings on the bottles of volatile liquid that fits only onto the right vaporizer. Closed Circuit Anesthesia there are many ways for getting from one place to another. you can sail on a small sailboat, a cruise ship, or a windsurfing board with various levels of comfort. same in anesthesia. some patients are small and some are large, and some are mean and uncooperative. we need to restrain them. consider the goal of induction. ultimately with inhaled anesthetic. we need to initially restrain them either moderately or markedly depending on temperament. we need to intubate and connect them to the machine. preoperative meds: we talked about this before, we'll do it again. today in generalities. we'll get more info later. most animals will be apprehensive, even friendly animals are this way in hospital environment. they may be cooperative but still apprehensive. this will cause increases in HR and BP due to sympathetic stimulation. also there are increased circulating catecholamines. drugs that interact with catecholamines to produce ventricular arrhythmias include xylazine, thiopental, propofol, and halothane (all sensitize myocardium to catechol effects). the animals may be in pain. in processing them for anesthesia you must move them and you may need analgesics. induction can be acheived by IM, IV, or inhalation administration of drugs. usually IV administration is used, so you need venous access - a needle or catheter. you need animal to be cooperative for this. so you give tranquilizers, sedatives, and/or opiates in various combinations. if we take a dog, give it hydromorphone, place an IV cath, give thiopental, intubate, what would happen if you just wait. what would the dog do over time? it would wake up in some amount of time. our goal, then, is a transition from the IV anesthetic to the inhaled anesthetic. you give the IV, intubate, connect to the machine, give inhaled anesthetic - goal is to get animal anesthetized with inhalant before it wakes up from IV. we need to consider how to achieve this. we know we can give some quantity of inhaled anesthetic based on amount and flow of anesthetic. you have your machine, and you can control two things - the vaporizer setting and the oxygen flow. for any chosen O2 flow, there is an appropriate vaporizer setting to have the patient at the right depth of anesthesia. consider the O2 flow. the minimum O2 flow we can deliver is the metabolic oxygen requirement. this varies with size - from 10 ml/kg/min for small animals to 2 ml/kg/min for large animals. this is the minimum amount you can deliver per minute to your patient. it is what they need. the maximum flow, if using the circle system, is the respiratory minute volume, which would make the circle non rebreathing. higher than that would be pointless, as nothing would change in the circuit. so your range may be from 5 ml/kg/min up to 200 ml/kg/min - very wide range. you also know now that depending on the flow you choose, you will influence the inspired concentration of inhaled anesthetic by the patient. in all discussions, consider most commonly used circuit and vaporizer system - circle system with VOC. what will the effect of O2 flow be on inspired concentration for VOC as you adjust flow up or down? when flow is high, inspired concentration is higher than when flow is low. one of the limiting factors is that the commercial vaporizers have some maximum concentration setting for the anesthetic - for iso and halo, max is 5%. as it happens, if you try to start induction with inhaled anesthetic at low flows, with the vaporizer at 5% (maximum), the patient will wake up from injectable anesth before falling asleep from the inhaled anesthetic. so, during induction with VOC, your flow must be high enough to produce a high enough inspired concentration to get the animal asleep at a reasonable time. what gas is in the patient's lungs prior to anesthesia? air. what is air? oxygen and nitrogen what is the gas in the circle system likely to be? air. you induce, intubate, connect to machine, and both patient and machine are full of air. you want to get anesthetic into the patient. you do this by providing a certain inspired concentration. you want to get the air out of the circuit and replace it with your fresh gas (O2 and anesthetci). as animal inhales and exhales, fresh gas mixes with exhaled gas and old gas is flushed out popoff valve. so, over time, the concentration of nitrogen being exhaled will decrease. as fresh gas flow (FGF) is smaller, nitrogen is flushed out of the system a little more slowly. in a hurry, use higher flow, not in a hurry, use lower flow. if you use high flows, though, most of your O2 and anesthetic is wasted and causes pollution, so be judicious. you have some concern for time and money, so you choose some intermediate flow rate that gets the nitrogen out fast enough without wasting too much stuff. there seems to be a fire in the building right now...we're evacuating. ok, we're back. some welders in the next room set some cardboard on fire. this wouldn't happen at Cornell, damnit. so, considering the flows to flush the nitrogen out of the circuit - a moderate flow of 1/2 the minute volume or less is reasonable. what other factors will affect inspired concentration? the circle itself is made of many parts which are rubber or plastic. the inhaled anesthetics are soluble to varying degrees in rubber and plastic. there is also a lot of sodalime which the anesthetics are soluble in. some amount of anesthetic going into circle are taken up by the plastic and chemical, lowering the inspired concentration. some agents like methoxyflurane are more soluble than other agents like halothane,causing a big difference in the dialed concentration you need to provide an adequate inspired concentration. what else? the patient. what happens in the patient? it inhales the gas, removes some of the gases and then exhales. so some amount of anesthetic is taken up, and the exhaled gas contains the leftover amount, less than what was inhaled. the difference b/w inhaled and exhaled anesthetic amount varies with time. at first, the patient has no anesthetic in itself, so it inhales and takes up proportionately more anesthetic which is distributed to various tissues. so exhaled gas is very low in anesthetic, early on. the exhaled gas mixes with fresh gas, lowering inspired concentration. over time, animal "fills up" with anesthetic, removing less and less from the inspired gas. for now, the important part is that it removes a lot early, and a lot less later. he's drawing a chart of inspired concentration and vaporizer settings vs time. goal is to acheive 1.3 mac for inspired concentration. that concentration should be the alveolar concentration. there are changes in the circuit that decrease inspired concentration, and so forth. if you dial 1.3 mac for halothane (1.2 %), and set the right flow, and look at the inspired concentration over time, you will get a curve starting at 0, rising, and approaching 1.3 % inspired. how long it takes depends on chosen flow and solubility of agent in the patient and the equipment. but for any agent, the itme it takes for the patient to have that inspired concentration would be unacceptably long. so what do you do to overcome this problem? instead of dialing 1.3 MAC, dial 2 MAC. now what happens? this is 2% for halothane. you get a similarly shaped curve that reaches 1.3 mac much more quickly. if you dial 3%, you reach 1.3 mac still more rapidly. so that is how you overcome the differences b/w inspired concentration and dial setting - start with a setting at a higher concentration of MAC than you want to acheive. now, if you leave the vaporizer setting that high, you will overanesthetize your patient, and possibly kill it. so the goal is to pick a MAC multiple that will get the animal to 1.3 mac at a reasonable amount of time (not too fast, not too slow), and when the animal reaches the appropriate depth of anesthesia, you will change the vaporizer setting and/or the flow, to provide a different inspired concentratino to maintain the animal. again, start at fixed flow - say 100 ml/kg/min, and dial 3% halothane - the animal goes to sleep quickly, you determine when it is deep enough, and then you decrease the inspired concentration - one of two ways. either turn the flow down, or turn the vaporizer down. there are reasons for choosing one or the other which we will discuss. going back to the vaporizer discussion - we talked about using 3% halothane to induce dogs with halothane - and these are the reasons for that. to get the animal asleep in a reasonable amount of time. look at methoxyflurane - it is more soluble in the plastic and in the patient. if you set the vaporizer for 1.3 mac for metofane, it would take a day to anesthetize it. even at 3 or 4 times mac for metofane, it would take a long time to reach the right depth of anesthesia in the patient, because so much is taken up that the exhaled gas has very little of it. so you have to use a much higher multiple of mac, about 10 times mac, to induce a patient with methoxyflurane. 1.3 mac is about 0.3 % for metofane. you need about 3% for induction. so even though mac for metofane and halothane are quite different, the vaporizer settings for induction are the same. this is because of solubility differences in the patient and the equipment. again: MAC for metofane is 0.2 something, and 1.3 mac is about 0.3%. metofane is really soluble in the patient and in the equipment. if you put the vaporizer on 0.3% it would take til tomorrow to reach the alveolar concentration of 0.3%. the way to overcome that is to use a higher vaporizer setting than 1.3 mac. using 2 or 3 times metofane mac is STILL not good enough. you have to use about 10 times metofane mac (that turns out to be 3% - 10 x 0.3) to induce with metofane in a reasonable amount of time. halothane, on the other hand, is less soluble in the patient and the equipment. it doesn't take as long to reach an alveolar concentration of 1.3 mac. you only need to use about 3 times halothane mac - which turns out to also be 3%. now, once you reach the anesthetic state required, you adjust for maintenance. you either decrease flow, or decrease vaporizer setting. once the animal is induced, you can choose either method to reach the maintenance concentration. people choose their preferred method. most places use a semi-closed circle system with moderate flows, some flow between the minimum and maximum. the minimum is 5ml/kg/min so some might use 20 or 50 ml/kg/min. everyone has a reason. here at penn, we use the minimum flows in a closed circle manner. why? good question. you need to know that not many people maintain anesthesia this way, though. Closed Circuit Anesthesia. flow requirement is th metaboli oxygen consumption. exceptions: -early on in inductino, to flush circuit. use of vaporizer out of circuit during early anesthesia due to maximum setting on vaporizer dial. -nitrous oxide - when you turn flows down, you can't use nitrous. if you use nitrous, you need a higher flow. -size of patient - patient size vs amount of sodalime - consider a zebra - it is large compared to the amount of sodalime in the cannister, so that sodalime won't remove all the CO2. at higher flows, the exhaled gas is flushed out so you dno't need as much sodalime, so a patient that is really large would need a higher flow maybe. arguments against closed circuit anesthesia and why they are invalid: 1. hypoxia - the flows we dial in closed circuit anesthesia are very low, at the lower limit of range of flow meter. usually, a measuring device is most inaccurate at the extremes of the device. this concerns some people. is that a valid concern? think about it. say a 10 kg dog is connected and the breathing bag is a 2 L bag (choose bag based on patient size). the bag is filled b/c we start at high flow. now, what gas is in the bag? oxygen, CO2, anesthetic. the gas before coming back to patient goes through sodalime, so that leaves O2 and anesthetic. we set the flow meter as inaccurate as possible - turn it off. will the animal become hypoxic? yes, it will use up the oxygen available at a rate equal to metabolic oxygen requirement - which is about 5 ml/kg/min, or 50 ml/min for this ten kg dog. the bag holds 2000 ml, so over time, every minute, the bag will get smaller by 50 ml. the gas animal inhales will be oxygen, and lower and lower concentrations of anesthetic. so in 40 minutes, bag will collapse and dog will get hypoxic. this is if flow meter is *off*. so, if there is small error, the bag will get smaller with time, but it will take much longer to collapse, so the whole concern about inaccuracy in the flow meter is invalid. 2. vaporizer accuracy at low flows - for modern vaporizers, this isn't a concern, even at very low flows. 3. unknown inspired concentration - anyone using a circle system at flows less than the minute volume (everyone) doesn't know the inspired concentration. all they know when they use higher flows than we use is that inspired concentration is closer to vaporizer setting than ours is. does that matter? if you have an anesthesia machine with a vaporizer and a scale with no numbers, and a flow meter with no numbers, and you don't know the anesthetic, could you anesthetize a patient? yes. keep O2 high enough that it is adequate - so start as high as possible. monitor the patient, watch the bag. keep adjusting flow until bag stays the same size - that mark on the scale is the animal's O2 consumption. then for vaporizer setting, start very low and adjust up as needed. that might be awkward at first but eventually you'd know about where to set it. you could mark S for start and M for maintain. it would work fine. you don't know the numbers. so what? 4. people say it is difficult. well, dr klide thinks it is no more or less difficult than any other method. 5. you have to monitor patient more closely. well, no. the patient doesn't know how you have achieved the inspired concentration! it just breathes. physiologically, it responds to the inspired concentration regardless of how you have acheived it. you still have to monitor appropriately as you do with any anesthetized patient, but there is no increased monitoring requirement with low flow anesthesia. Advantages of Low Flow: to the wallet/world: 2. minimizes use of oxygen and anesthetic - usually the % of that used vs that delivered is very low, and the rest is wasted as it goes through popoff valve. with low flows, there is less waste. 3. saves time filling vaporizers because you use less anesthetic - therefore reduces human exposure during filling time 4. saves ordering and handling time 5. decreased use of natural resources - energy is used in the creation of oxygen tanks and anesthetics. to the patient: 1. conserves heat - more warm exhaled gas is retained in the circle, temp of inspired gas is higher at low flows, slowing heat loss 2. conserves water vapor - as flows are decreased, inspired concentration of water vapor increases, preserving normal respiratory function 3. keeps CO2 absorbent moist - if sodalime dries out, there are reactions which produce toxic breakdown products esp for desflurane, enflurane, and isoflurane which make CO and sevoflurane which makes a nephrotoxin. 4. provides physiological information - if you anesthetize an animal and it's on maintenance at low flow, and the bag inflates and deflates at constant rate over time, and then suddenly the bag starts getting bigger, that means that the animal has started using less oxygen - might indicate a drop in temperature (causes small decrease in O2 use), or might indicate accidental change in flow rate for mechanical reasons (bump into machine, etc), or might indicate a decrease in cardiac output (assess cardiovascular status!) other advantages: 1. minimizes global pollution - ozone layer effects, acid rain, global warming. 2. also, it's much slicker. Disadvantages: None, but you have to change soda lime more often, which may really be an advantage because it reduces risks of making breakdown products. may also be hard to find leaks. Semi-closed system advantages: None. some say it will increase the income of the manufacturers of the anesthetics... Disadvantages of semi-closed system - opposite of closed circuit advantages. so for closed circuit anesthesia, you get better results at a lower cost. ----end---